Section 62 NAG covers a residence permit for a specific employer and activities outside the AuslBG. The activity and possible AMS assessment are decisive.
Section 62 NAG concerns a dedicated residence permit for third-country nationals who intend to carry out dependent employment with a specific employer. The title is not a general route into the Austrian labour market. It is tied to a narrowly defined exemption from the Act Governing the Employment of Foreign Nationals.
The provision requires, first, compliance with Part 1 of the NAG. Second, the concrete activity must be outside the substantive scope of the AuslBG under section 1(2)(e) or (j). Third, where there are justified doubts, the Public Employment Service may determine at the authority's request whether the activity actually falls within the exemption.
The assessment must therefore connect the person, employer, activity and statutory exemption. This article distinguishes section 62 NAG from the posted-employee permit under section 59 NAG and from ICT mobility.
The check sorts the statutory exemption, the employer and the role of the AMS. The result can be sent with the relevant facts.
Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.
For the basic route, section 62(1)(2) NAG names the exemptions in section 1(2)(e) or (j) AuslBG. Another exemption does not automatically support this title. First assign the activity to the correct NAG provision or to an expressly applicable regulation.
The section 62 NAG permit is designed for dependent employment with a specific employer. If the employer, tasks or contractual conditions are still open, the classification cannot be completed reliably. Clarify the employer relationship and activity profile first.
The activity is assigned to a named AuslBG exemption and the employer is fixed. Now organise the Part 1 NAG requirements together with the contract, activity description and evidence of the exemption. Our article on posted employees under section 59 NAG covers a different posting category.
Where there are justified doubts, the competent regional AMS office may determine at the authority's request whether the activity meets the named AuslBG exemption. Prepare the activity, programme or assignment and employer relationship so that the classification can be understood. The AMS assessment does not replace the other section 62 NAG requirements.
Section 62(1) NAG allows a residence permit for third-country nationals to carry out dependent employment with a specific employer. The first step is to check Part 1 of the NAG. The title does not replace the complete personal and residence-law application package.
The additional special requirement concerns the activity. It must be outside the substantive scope of the AuslBG under section 1(2)(e) or (j). The exemption concerns the actual activity and is not merely a general description of the intended stay.
Section 62 NAG therefore links residence law to a statutory employment-law exemption. The title does not become appropriate simply because an employer wants to employ someone. The legal classification of the actual task is decisive.
Section 1(2)(e) AuslBG concerns foreign nationals in their activity as crew members in cross-border sea and inland navigation. For section 62 NAG, the activity must genuinely fall within this statutory group. Employment by a foreign company or travel to Austria alone is not enough.
Section 1(2)(j) AuslBG concerns foreign nationals in activities carried out within education, training or research programmes of the European Union. The specific programme framework matters. A private training course or any research project does not automatically become an activity under section 1(2)(j).
The boundary to section 1(2)(i) AuslBG matters as well. That provision covers scientific activity in research and teaching and other activities listed there. For the basic section 62(1)(2) NAG route, however, the statutory reference is to section 1(2)(e) or (j). The research and teaching exemption must therefore not be transferred into the section 62 route without a separate check.
The title is tied to dependent employment with a specific employer. The employer, contract, tasks and programme must therefore describe the same legal constellation. The more general the activity description, the more difficult it becomes to assess the AuslBG exemption.
Preparation should connect a clear employer name, function, period, place of work and description of the programme or crew activity. For an activity under section 1(2)(j), it should also be clear which European Union education, training or research programme provides the framework.
A later employer change or a move into ordinary employment is not merely an internal contractual amendment. It can change the basis of the specific title. Before a change, check whether section 62 NAG still applies or whether another residence title is required.
Under section 62(1)(3) NAG, the competent regional AMS office determines at the authority's request, where there are justified doubts, whether an activity under point 2 exists. The wording does not describe an automatic AMS assessment in every application.
The authority needs a concrete reason for doubt. The question concerns the activity and its assignment to the named exemption. It is not the same as a general labour-market test and it does not replace the review of the other NAG requirements.
A well-prepared application should already make the classification apparent from the contract, activity profile and programme documents. If those documents conflict, the possible AMS question should be addressed openly during preparation.
The Part 1 NAG requirements must be checked and evidenced in addition to the exemption. The exact documents depend on the person, the residence route and the facts. The contract, passport, activity profile and programme documents should tell the same story.
Section 62 NAG does not create general labour-market access. It is not the Red White Red Card and it is not a general residence permit for any dependent employment. The employer link and the specific exemption remain central.
For a classic posting from a foreign employer to an Austrian service recipient, the boundary to section 59 NAG matters. For an intra-group transfer from another Member State, the ICT and mobile ICT rules must be assessed separately.
Section 62(2) NAG allows the Federal Minister of the Interior to designate further activities by regulation as activities within section 62(1)(2), where they are outside the substantive scope of the AuslBG under the AuslBVO. This opens a regulated extension beyond the two expressly named letters but requires an applicable regulation.
An activity must therefore not be assigned to section 62 NAG merely because of its label. Before applying, establish whether it falls under section 1(2)(e) or (j) or whether a relevant regulation actually applies. The law in force at the time of the application must be checked.
No. The basic section 62(1)(2) NAG route refers to activities under section 1(2)(e) or (j) AuslBG. Further activities can only be included through an applicable regulation under section 62(2) NAG.
Section 1(2)(e) concerns crew members working in cross-border sea and inland navigation. Whether a specific assignment qualifies depends on the actual tasks and the cross-border setting.
No. Under section 62(1)(3) NAG, the competent regional AMS office may determine at the authority's request, where there are justified doubts, whether the activity meets the exemption. This is not an automatic general labour-market test.
The title is designed for dependent employment with a specific employer. An employer change or a material change in the activity may therefore require a new review of the residence title and the AuslBG basis.
A separate residence permit for classic postings.
Assess intra-group transfer and mobility separately.
Do not confuse employer-bound titles with section 62 NAG.
Initial orientation on the appropriate residence title.